SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kamau v Association of Action International & 2 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E009 of 2020) [2025] KECA 659 (KLR) (9 April 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 659 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
659
Citation
[2025] KECA 659 (KLR)
Decided
9 April 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for leave to amend the memorandum of appealCoramPM GACHOKA, Richard
Holding

The application is granted, and the applicant is directed to file its memorandum of appeal amended on 12th February 2024 within seven days from the date of this order. The costs of the application shall abide the outcome of the appeal.

Facts

The applicant was dissatisfied with the findings of the Naivasha High Court in HCCC NO. 9 OF 2018 and filed a notice of appeal, subsequently a memorandum of appeal. The applicant noted several inadvertent mistakes requiring amendment.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application for leave to amend the memorandum of appeal should be granted
  2. Whether the amendments are necessary, proper, and substantial to enable the court to arrive at a holistic decision

Reasoning

The Court finds no reason why the amendments should not be allowed, and the applicant is directed to file the amended memorandum of appeal within seven days.

Outcome

Granted

Orders

  • The applicant is directed to file its memorandum of appeal amended on 12th February 2024 within seven days from the date of this order
  • The costs of the application shall abide the outcome of the appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Rule 46 (1) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022
  • John Mugambi & Mugambi & Company Advocates vs. Kiama Wangai [2021] KECA 952 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case