SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Speaker of the National Assembly & another v Orange Democratic Movement Party & 8 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E907 of 2024) [2025] KECA 681 (KLR) (11 April 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 681 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
681
Citation
[2025] KECA 681 (KLR)
Decided
11 April 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for conservatory orders and/or stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the appealCoramF. A. Ochieng, W. K. Korir, Joel Ngugi
Holding

The application is dismissed as the applicants have failed to satisfy the requirements for the grant of stay of execution or conservatory orders.

Facts

The applicants are dissatisfied with the High Court judgment declaring the Privatisation Act, 2023 unconstitutional due to lack of meaningful public participation. The High Court also declared section 22(5) of the Privatisation Act, 2023 unconstitutional and that the decision to privatize Kenyatta International Conference Centre contravenes Article 11(2) of the Constitution.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court judgment should be stayed pending the appeal
  2. Whether conservatory orders should be issued to prevent the Privatisation Act, 2023 from becoming effective during the appeal process

Reasoning

The court found that the High Court judgment did not create a vacuum and that the statute was not constitutionally invalid. The court also noted that compelling public interest considerations were not demonstrated to warrant a stay.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Privatisation Act, 2023
  • Monuments and Heritage Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case