SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Akuma (As Administrator of Teresa Ombeo (Deceased)) v Araka & another (Civil Application E146 of 2024) [2025] KECA 709 (KLR) (25 April 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 709 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
709
Citation
[2025] KECA 709 (KLR)
Decided
25 April 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for extension of time to file and serve the record of appealCoramLK KIMARU
Holding

The application has merit and is hereby allowed. The applicant is granted leave to appeal out of time.

Facts

The applicant, Daniel Ombeo Akuma, as administrator of Teresa Ombeo (deceased), sought leave to file and serve the notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time due to delay in lodging the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the exercise of discretion by the Court to extend time for filing the appeal.
  2. Whether the applicant has sufficiently explained the reason for the delay in lodging the appeal.
  3. Whether the applicant will be prejudiced if the order for extension of time is granted.

Reasoning

The applicant explained the reason for the delay in lodging the appeal due to inaction by his former advocate. The length of delay is about 30 days and is not inordinate.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to appeal out of time.
  • The applicant shall lodge and serve the notice of appeal within fourteen (14) days of today’s date.
  • The applicant shall file and serve the memorandum and record of appeal within Forty-five (45) days after the service of the notice of appeal.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Paul Wanjohi Mathane v. Duncan Gichore Mathenge [2013] eKLR.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case