Sang & 2 others v Kugun & 8 others (Civil Application E043 of 2024) [2025] KECA 739 (KLR) (5 May 2025) (Ruling)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 739
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 739 (KLR)
- Decided
- 5 May 2025
The application is dismissed with costs to the 1st and 2nd Interested Parties.
Facts
The applicants sought an extension of time to file and serve notice of appeal and record of appeal against the judgment issued on 18th November 2022 in Eldoret ELC No.233 of 2012. They claimed their advocate never filed the record of appeal on time and appointed a new advocate. The respondents opposed the application, stating the applicants failed to demonstrate efforts to contact their advocate and the delay was inexcusable.
Issues
- Whether the applicants' delay in filing and serving the appeal was reasonable and excusable.
- Whether the applicants' failure to include a prayer for extension of time to serve the letter bespeaking typed proceedings was fatal to the application.
Reasoning
The court found the applicants' reasons for the delay were not plausible and did not demonstrate any steps taken to find out if their erstwhile advocates had filed the record of appeal. The court dismissed the application as the delay was unexplained and prejudicial to the Interested Parties.
Outcome
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs to the 1st and 2nd Interested Parties.
Authorities cited
Cases cited (5)
- Wasike vs. Swala [1984] KLR 591
- Rajesh Rughani vs. Fifty Investments Limited & Ano. [2016] eKLR
- Habo Agencies Limited vs. Wilfrewd Odhiambo Musingo [2015] eKLR
- Yusuf Gitau Abdalla vs. The Building Centre (K) Ltd & 4 Others [2014] eKLR
- Rajesh Rughani vs. Fifty Investments Limited & Ano. [2005] eKLR
Loading judgment…