SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwadzaya v County Government of Kilifi & another (Civil Appeal 46 of 2019) [2025] KECA 869 (KLR) (23 May 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 869 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
869
Citation
[2025] KECA 869 (KLR)
Decided
23 May 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment and Decree of the Land and Environment Court of Kenya at MalindiCoramAK MURGOR, Olola
Holding

The Court held that the respondents had the legal authority to issue the notice of demolition, as the appellant had not obtained written approval to construct the buildings and had encroached into a road reserve.

Facts

The appellant, Rassul N. Mwadzaya, claimed that he was the registered allottee of a parcel of land known as Plot No. 8 in Mariakani Town, which he purchased in 1994 and issued with an allotment letter. The respondents, County Government of Kilifi and the Secretary, County Government of Kilifi, issued a 14-day notice of demolition of the suit property, alleging encroachment into a road reserve. The appellant contested the notice, stating he had been in occupation since 1994 and had not encroached into any road reserve.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondents had the legal authority to issue a notice of demolition
  2. Whether the appellant had the necessary approvals to construct the buildings on the suit property

Reasoning

The Court found that the appellant had not obtained written approval to construct the buildings and had encroached into a road reserve, thus the respondents had the legal authority to issue the notice of demolition.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case