SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Thoya v Mwaro (Civil Appeal E041 of 2022) [2025] KECA 931 (KLR) (7 March 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 931 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
931
Citation
[2025] KECA 931 (KLR)
Decided
7 March 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the Environment and Land Court of Kenya at MalindiCoramA. K. MURGOR, DR. K. I. LAIBUTA, G. W. NGENYE-MACHARIA
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent, as the appellant's acquisition of the suit property was marred with illegality and irregularity, rendering issuance of the suit property to him a nullity.

Facts

Respondent Yaa Baya Mwaro claimed that he had settled on an unregistered parcel of land in Magarini-Mabomu in 1948, built houses, planted trees, and cultivated the land. He alleged that the appellant, Karisa Kazungu Thoya, unlawfully allocated the land to himself in 1986 and registered him as the proprietor. Respondent also claimed compensation for trees cut down by the Kenya Electricity Transmission Company.

Issues

  1. Ownership of the suit property
  2. Legality and irregularity of the appellant's acquisition

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent was in possession of the suit property since 1948 and was entitled to ownership of the property. The court also noted that the Land Disputes Tribunal proceedings demonstrated that the respondent had consistently claimed ownership of the suit property.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case