SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Katram Limited & another v Waithaka (Civil Application E460 of 2024) [2025] KECA 985 (KLR) (30 May 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 985 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
985
Citation
[2025] KECA 985 (KLR)
Decided
30 May 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for extension of time to file an appealCoramW. KARANJA
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent

Facts

Katram Limited and Rahab Mukiama were defendants in ELC Suit No. 177 of 2010 filed against them by John Roki Waithaka. The court entered judgment in favor of Waithaka, declaring him the legitimate owner of LR No. 20530 and ordering the applicants to pay Kshs.1,500,000 in general damages for trespass.

Issues

  1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal was inordinate
  2. Whether the applicants have a good appeal with chances of success

Reasoning

The delay in filing the appeal was found to be inordinate and the applicants' explanation was deemed implausible. The court also found that the applicants have a herculean task in convincing the court to rule in their favor.

Outcome

Dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs to the respondent

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Andrew Kiplagat Chemaringo v Paul Kipkorir Kibet (2018) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case