SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mauti & another v Momanyi & another (Civil Appeal 208 of 2019) [2025] KECA 996 (KLR) (30 May 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 996 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
996
Citation
[2025] KECA 996 (KLR)
Decided
30 May 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at KisiiCoramH. A. OMONDI, L. KIMARU, JOEL NGUGI, JM NGUGI, Majanja
Holding

The appeal is allowed to the effect that the award of Kshs.250,000 and the costs awarded be and is hereby set aside and, in its place, the Court restores the trial court's judgment in favour of the appellant in the sum of Kshs.780,500 with costs.

Facts

The appellants, Bonface Metobwa Mauti and Stella Kemuma Mauti, sued the respondents, Sameta Lodges Ltd and John Philys Momanyi, in their capacity as the administrators of the estate of their son, WNM, who died in an accident involving the respondent's vehicle. The appellants sought compensation for the loss they suffered following his death.

Issues

  1. The trial court's award of damages for loss of dependency was excessive.
  2. The trial court's award of damages for loss of dependency was excessive.
  3. The trial court's award of damages for loss of dependency was excessive.

Reasoning

The learned judge held that the trial court's award of Kshs.800,000 for loss of dependency was excessive and set it aside, awarding Kshs.250,000 instead.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The award of Kshs.250,000 and the costs awarded be and is hereby set aside.
  • The Court restores the trial court's judgment in favour of the appellant in the sum of Kshs.780,500 with costs.

Remedies

  • Restoration of the trial court's judgment in favour of the appellant in the sum of Kshs.780,500 with costs.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya Breweries Ltd vs. Saro [1991] KECA 12 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case