SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Manyonyi v African Medical and Research Foundation (Civil Appeal 330 of 2019) [2026] KECA 101 (KLR) (23 January 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KECA 101 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
101
Citation
[2026] KECA 101 (KLR)
Decided
23 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramF. TUIYOTT, A. O. MUCHELULE, G. V. ODUNGA
Holding

The termination was unlawful due to the employer's breach of the procedure set out in clause 8.3.2 of the Employment Act. The judgment is set aside, and the appellant is awarded two (2) months gross salary less statutory deductions.

Facts

The appellant, Dr. Kennedy Amuhaya Manyonyi, was terminated from his position as Chief of Party with the respondent's Aphia Plus Marisha project on July 1, 2013. He had previously received positive appraisals from his supervisor and the County Director. However, serious allegations were made about his performance, leading to a series of meetings and a revised contract.

Issues

  1. Whether the termination was lawful
  2. Whether the employer breached the procedure set out in clause 8.3.2 of the Employment Act

Reasoning

The court found that the employer acted in haste when it abridged the procedure set out in clause 8.3.2, leading to an unlawful termination. The appellant contributed to his circumstances by failing to improve his performance despite opportunities and support.

Outcome

Partial success in the appeal, with the judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court set aside.

Orders

  • The termination of the appellant is declared unlawful.
  • The appellant is awarded two (2) months gross salary less statutory deductions.

Remedies

  • Interest on the amount at court rates from the date of the judgment by the trial court (2nd November 2018)

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case