SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Postel directories Limited v D Yellow Pages Publishing & Marketing Limited & another (Civil Appeal 562 of 2019) [2026] KECA 105 (KLR) (30 January 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KECA 105 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
105
Citation
[2026] KECA 105 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a High Court ruling dismissing an application for review of earlier ordersCoramD. K. MUSINGA, JOEL NGUGI, G. V. ODUNGA
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent

Facts

The appellant initiated a copyright infringement suit in 2002, which was repeatedly adjourned due to incomplete pre-trial processes and non-compliance with procedural directions. The 1st respondent moved for dismissal for want of prosecution, which was granted by Farah Amin, J. in 2016. The appellant did not appeal this decision. The appellant then filed an application seeking dismissal of the 1st respondent's counterclaim, which was also dismissed by Farah Amin, J. in 2017. The appellant then filed a further application seeking review of the earlier orders, which was dismissed by Onguto, J.

Issues

  1. Whether the learned Judge erred in holding that bias could not found a review before a non-final court
  2. Whether the learned Judge misapplied the test for error apparent on the face of the record
  3. Whether the learned Judge failed to vindicate the appellant's right to equal treatment under Articles 10, 27, and 159 of the Constitution
  4. Whether the learned Judge wrongly declined to exercise the review jurisdiction to correct what the appellant characterizes as a glaring judicial inconsistency

Reasoning

The court found no basis to fault the learned Judge's invocation of finality and issue estoppel. The appellant's strategic choice not to appeal earlier rulings precludes invoking review as a surrogate appellate process.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case