SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Olima v Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology (JOOUST) (Civil Appeal (Application) E228 of 2022) [2026] KECA 11 (KLR) (21 January 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 11 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
11
Citation
[2026] KECA 11 (KLR)
Decided
21 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for extension of time to substitute the deceased appellant out of timeCoramLK KIMARU
Holding

The application has merit and is hereby allowed. The appeal that abated by the operation of the law is hereby ordered revived. The applicant, Beatrice Atieno Wando shall substitute the deceased as the appellant in this appeal. There shall be no orders as to costs.

Facts

The deceased appellant, Prof. Washington H.A. Olima, died on 29th February 2024. His widow, Beatrice Atieno Wando, filed an application seeking to be granted leave and extension of time to substitute the deceased appellant out of time due to the death of her mother within the year of her husband's death.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant established 'sufficient cause' for her failure to file the application for substitution within the period provided by the Rules of twelve months.
  2. Whether the applicant was prevented from filing the application for substitution due to the tragedies that befell her family during the material period.

Reasoning

The Court is persuaded that the applicant was prevented from filing the application for substitution due to the tragedies that befell her family during the material period.

Outcome

The appeal is revived and the applicant is substituted as the appellant.

Orders

  • The appeal that abated by the operation of the law is hereby ordered revived.
  • The applicant, Beatrice Atieno Wando shall substitute the deceased as the appellant in this appeal.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case