SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Southern Shield Holdings Limited v Titus Makhanu Associates Advocates & another (Civil Application E440 of 2025) [2026] KECA 120 (KLR) (30 January 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 120 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
120
Citation
[2026] KECA 120 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for extension of time to file and serve a Record of AppealCoramF. TUIYOTT, JA
Holding

The application is granted, and the applicant shall file and serve the record of appeal within 45 days of this ruling.

Facts

Southern Shield Holdings Limited filed an appeal against a High Court decision dated 27th September, 2024, but was late in instituting the appeal. The applicant requested typed proceedings and a certified copy of the order, which were not provided until 6th February, 2025 and 12th May, 2025 respectively.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application for extension of time to file and serve a Record of Appeal is deserving
  2. Whether the respondents will suffer prejudice or inconvenience if the application is granted

Reasoning

The court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, considering factors such as the period of delay, the reason for the delay, and the importance of compliance with time limits. The court found that the applicant's application was brought in the best interest of justice and fairness.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • The applicant shall file and serve the record of appeal within 45 days of this ruling

Remedies

  • Costs of this application shall be in the intended appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules
  • Rules of Court
Cases cited (1)
  • Fakir Mohamed v Joseph Mugambi & 2 others [2005] KECA 340 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case