SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mattan Issa Restaurant v Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union (Civil Application E141 of 2022) [2026] KECA 185 (KLR) (30 January 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 185 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
185
Citation
[2026] KECA 185 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for leave to serve Record of Appeal out of timeCoramHA OMONDI
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Facts

The applicant, Mattan Issa Restaurant, was dissatisfied with the Employment and Labour Relations Court's decision dated 6 October, 2021. The record of appeal was prepared on 13 June, 2022, but was not served on the respondent until 7 June 2023, over a year after the statutory period had lapsed.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's delay in serving the record of appeal was inordinate and prejudicial to the respondent.
  2. Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend the time limit for serving the record of appeal.

Reasoning

The court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, finding the delay to be over a year and the reason for the delay to be work pressure, which was not satisfactorily explained. The court concluded that the applicant's delay was not reasonable and therefore did not exercise its discretion in favour of the applicant.

Outcome

Dismissed with costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Godfrey Kinuu Maingi & 4 others vs. Nthimbiri Farmers Co-op. Society Ltd & another [2008] eKLR
  • Kenya Bankers Cooperative & another vs. George Arunga Sino [2010] eKLR
  • Fakir Mohammed vs. Joseph Mugambi & 2 Others [2005] eKLR
  • Paul Wanjohi Mathane vs. Duncan Gichare Mathenge [2013] eKLR
  • Andrew Kiplagat Chemaringo vs. Paul Kipkorir Kibet [2018] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case