SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Oyugi & 2 others (Suing as the Administrators of the Estate of Hezekiah Nelson Oyugi - Deceased) v Sherman & another (Civil Application E476 of 2025) [2026] KECA 236 (KLR) (13 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 236 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
236
Citation
[2026] KECA 236 (KLR)
Decided
13 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for injunction pending appealCoramS. GATEMBU KAIRU, MUMBI NGUGI, P. NYAMWEYA
Holding

An injunction is granted to restrain the 1st respondent from transferring or otherwise disposing of the suit property pending hearing and determination of the applicants' appeal.

Facts

The applicants are the administrators of the estate of Hezekiah Nelson Oyugi, who was the registered proprietor of LR No. 209/4491, Lavington. The 1st respondent, Timdar Said Sherman, had transferred the property to her in 1998, and the applicants sought an injunction to restrain her from selling or interfering with the property.

Issues

  1. Constructive trust issue not pleaded by the 1st respondent
  2. Applicants' appeal on the basis of forged court order

Reasoning

The court found that the applicants have an arguable appeal and that the subject matter of the suit is land valued at Kshs.350-400 million. The court also noted that the 1st respondent has not deposed to her ability to compensate the applicants in damages if she disposes of the property prior to the appeal.

Outcome

Appeal granted

Orders

  • Injunction restraining the 1st respondent from transferring or otherwise disposing of the suit property pending hearing and determination of the applicants' appeal

Remedies

  • Preservation of the subject matter of the appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Githunguri v Jimba Credit Corporation Ltd (No 2) [1988] KECA 141 (KLR)
  • 227]
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case