SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwaura v CIC Insurance Group Ltd (Civil Appeal 548 of 2019) [2026] KECA 250 (KLR) (13 February 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KECA 250 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
250
Citation
[2026] KECA 250 (KLR)
Decided
13 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Employment and Labour Relations Court of KenyaCoramP. O. KIAGE, A. O. MUCHELULE, W. KORIR
Holding

The appeal is partly allowed, and the appellant is entitled to twelve (12) days unpaid salary for the month of February, 2016. The trial court's finding that the appellant was constructively terminated is reversed.

Facts

The appellant, Peter Mutarura Mwaura, was employed by the respondent, CIC Insurance Group Ltd, as an Assistant Accountant. The respondent placed Imperial Bank under the management of the Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation due to unsafe and unsound business conditions. The appellant requested information about the exposure level of the bank, which was allegedly mislead by the Investment Manager. The appellant resigned, and the respondent terminated his employment.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant was constructively dismissed
  2. Whether the appellant is entitled to reinstatement and salary arrears

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant's resignation was not forced by the employer and that the trial court misdirected itself in finding constructive dismissal.

Outcome

Partially allowed

Orders

  • The appellant is entitled to twelve (12) days unpaid salary for the month of February, 2016
  • The trial court's finding that the appellant was constructively terminated is reversed

Remedies

  • Unpaid salary for 12 days
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case