SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Igainya Ltd & 2 others v Githae & 5 others (Civil Appeal 655 of 2019) [2026] KECA 252 (KLR) (13 February 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KECA 252 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
252
Citation
[2026] KECA 252 (KLR)
Decided
13 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment dismissing the appellants' claim for mandatory injunction and mesne profits.CoramA. O. Mucelule, W. Korir
Holding

The appeal is dismissed as the title to the suit property cannot be said to have been a good title, and the doctrine of bona fide purchaser cannot cure an illegality at inception.

Facts

The appellants sought a mandatory injunction and mesne profits against the respondents over a property (suit property) along Ngong Road, Nairobi. The respondents denied the claim, arguing that the suit property was already handed over to them and that the purported sale was void.

Issues

  1. Validity of the purported sale of the suit property
  2. Applicability of the Local Government Act
  3. Good faith purchaser doctrine

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal found that the title to the suit property was not a good title due to the lack of evidence showing the necessary consent from the Minister for Local Government and the illegality of the purported sale. The Court also cited Funzi Island Development Limited & 2 Others vs. County Council of Kwale & 2 Others [2014] KECA 882 (KLR) and Pati Limited vs. Funzi Island Development Limited & 4 Others [2021] KESC 29 (KLR) to support its decision.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Local Government Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Funzi Island Development Limited & 2 Others vs. County Council of Kwale & 2 Others [2014] KECA 882 (KLR)
  • Pati Limited vs. Funzi Island Development Limited & 4 Others [2021] KESC 29 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case