SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Wildlife Service v Wangui (Suing as legal representative of the Estate of James Ng'ang;a - Dcd) (Civil Application E546 of 2025) [2026] KECA 380 (KLR) (27 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 380 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
380
Citation
[2026] KECA 380 (KLR)
Decided
27 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for extension of time to file and serve a Notice of AppealCoramJM NGUGI, F. Muchemi
Holding

The application is allowed. The Applicant is granted leave to file and serve a Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal out of time.

Facts

The Kenya Wildlife Service sought an extension of time to appeal a judgment issued by the High Court of Kenya in Thika, delivered on 31st July, 2025.

Issues

  1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal was inordinate and inexcusable.
  2. Whether the intended appeal raises arguable questions of law.
  3. Whether the delay caused prejudice to the Respondent.

Reasoning

The Court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022, to extend the time for filing the appeal due to the Applicant's admission of oversight and prompt corrective action.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • The Notice of Appeal shall be filed and served within seven (7) days of the date of this ruling.
  • The Record of Appeal shall be filed and served within fourteen (14) days thereafter.

Remedies

  • Costs shall abide the outcome of the appeal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022
  • Wildlife Conservation and Management Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi [1999] 2 EA 231
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 Others [2014] eKLR
  • Fakir Mohamed v Joseph Mugambi & 2 Others [2005] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case