SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya National Higway Authority v SBI International Holdings (Kenya) (Civil Application E382 of 2025) [2026] KECA 402 (KLR) (27 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 402 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
402
Citation
[2026] KECA 402 (KLR)
Decided
27 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time to file Notice of Appeal out of time and stay of execution pending an appealCoramW. KARANJA
Holding

The application is allowed, and the Notice of Appeal dated 2nd May 2025 is deemed to have been filed within time. The notice is to be served on the respondent within 7 days from the date of the ruling, and the record of appeal is to be served within 14 days of the notice.

Facts

The applicant, Kenya National Higway Authority, sought an extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal out of time and a stay of execution of a ruling by Hon. Justice V. M. Mochache. The applicant claimed the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal was not inordinate and was excusable.

Issues

  1. Whether the application for extension of time to file Notice of Appeal out of time is merited.
  2. Whether the application for stay of execution is valid.

Reasoning

The court considered the law and the facts, concluding that the delay was not inordinate and was excusable, thus allowing the application.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • Order that the Notice of Appeal dated 2nd May 2025 is deemed to have been filed within time.
  • Order that the notice be served on the respondent within 7 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Order that the record of appeal be served within 14 days of the notice of appeal.

Remedies

  • Extension of time to file Notice of Appeal out of time and stay of execution pending an appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Mwangi -vs- Kenya Airways Ltd (2003) KRL 486
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case