SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

N Kenya County Government of Workers Union v County Government of Vihiga & 4 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E048 of 2026) [2026] KECA 489 (KLR) (10 March 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 489 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
489
Citation
[2026] KECA 489 (KLR)
Decided
10 March 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for extension of time to file and serve the record of appealCoramLK KIMARU
Holding

The application has merit and is hereby allowed. The record of appeal filed in Court on 8th December, 2025 is hereby deemed to have been properly filed and within time.

Facts

The applicant, N Kenya County Government of Workers Union, filed a notice of appeal against the Ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya at Kakamega on 26th September, 2025. They sought to challenge the Ruling on appeal to the Court of Appeal. However, they did not file the record of appeal within the prescribed time due to a delay in obtaining a certificate of delay in time.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application for extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal should be granted
  2. Whether the delay in filing the appeal was excusable and whether the respondents would suffer prejudice

Reasoning

The Court is persuaded by the reasons advanced by the applicant for the delay in lodging the appeal in time. The delay of one (1) day is not inordinate and is excusable.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • The record of appeal filed in Court on 8th December, 2025 is deemed to have been properly filed and within time.
  • The said record of appeal shall be served upon the respondents within seven (7) days of today’s date.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case