SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Saikwa (Suing as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrew Kisa Saikwa) v Vomorono Limited & 7 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E303 of 2021) [2026] KECA 493 (KLR) (13 March 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 493 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
493
Citation
[2026] KECA 493 (KLR)
Decided
13 March 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for substitution of deceased appellant in Civil Appeal No. E303 of 2021CoramMumbi Ngugi, Musinga, P. Nyamweya
Holding

The application is allowed in terms of prayers 2 and 3 thereof. Each party shall bear its costs.

Facts

The deceased, Andrew Kisa Saikwa, died on 19th June 1985. Moses Kiplangat Saikwa, deceased, filed Civil Appeal No. E303 of 2021 as his legal representative. The appellant, Moses Kiplangat Saikwa, died on 17th February 2024 while the appeal was pending. The 4th applicant was appointed as the legal representative of the appellant, but her application to be substituted as the appellant in the appeal was dismissed.

Issues

  1. Whether the application is res judicata
  2. Whether the application is an abuse of the process of the court
  3. Whether the application is timely

Reasoning

The court finds no merit in the objection to the application as the previous application was dismissed for non-joinder of parties, not on merit. The application is not res judicata. The court also finds merit in the application as the applicants are the proper parties to be substituted in the appeal in place of the appellant.

Outcome

Application allowed

Orders

  • Application for substitution of the deceased appellant in the appeal is allowed

Remedies

  • Each party shall bear its costs
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case