SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wanjohi v Parteru & another (Civil Application 76 of 2019) [2026] KECA 703 (KLR) (25 March 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 703 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
703
Citation
[2026] KECA 703 (KLR)
Decided
25 March 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for leave to appeal against the ruling and orders of the High Court of KenyaCoramW. KORIR, H. ONG’UDI, S. OKONG’O
Holding

The application is allowed, and a new Grant of Letters of Administration is issued to the respondents.

Facts

The deceased died in 1998, and the respondents were issued with a Grant of Letters of Administration in 2015. The suit property was registered in the name of the applicant, who purchased it from the deceased in 1993. The respondents sold the property to Mundia in 2015.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court was right in issuing the Grant of Letters of Administration without jurisdiction.
  2. Whether the High Court was right in failing to declare the Grant of Letters of Administration and all consequential actions null and void.
  3. Whether the High Court was right in declaring Mundia as a bona fide purchaser without notice of any defect in its title.
  4. Whether the High Court was right in gagging the ELC from considering the validity of the Grant of Letters of Administration.

Reasoning

The Court finds merit in the application and considers the issues raised.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • Issue a new Grant of Letters of Administration to the respondents in place of the one found to have been issued without jurisdiction and to confirm it in its impugned judgment without a petition for Grant of Letters of Administration before it.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case