SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kandie v Chande & 4 others (Civil Appeal (Application) 24 of 2020) [2026] KECA 83 (KLR) (30 January 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECA 83 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
83
Citation
[2026] KECA 83 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureReference against the Ruling and Orders of the Court of Appeal at Mombasa (L. Achode, JA.) dated 11th April 2025CoramA. K. Murgor, Dr. K. I. LaibuTa, G. W. Ngenye-Macharia
Holding

The applicant's Reference dated 11th April 2021 is hereby allowed, and the ruling of the Hon. Single Judge (L. Achode, JA.) dated 11th April 2025 is set aside. The applicant's bill of costs dated 22nd June 2023 is remitted for re-taxation by a Taxing Officer other than Hon. Adika.

Facts

The applicant, David Kandie, challenged the ruling of the Taxing Officer (H. Adika, DR.) in a Reference dated 4th December 2023, seeking to set aside the ruling and remit the bill of costs for re-taxation.

Issues

  1. Taxing Officer's assessment of instructions fees
  2. Consistency in awarding instructions fees

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal found that the Taxing Officer erred in assessing the instructions fees and that the award was manifestly excessive. The Court also noted that the award was inconsistent with previous cases.

Outcome

The applicant's Reference is allowed, and the ruling of the Taxing Officer is set aside.

Orders

  • The ruling of the Taxing Officer is set aside.
  • The applicant's bill of costs is remitted for re-taxation by a Taxing Officer other than Hon. Adika.
  • The parties shall bear their own costs of the Reference.

Remedies

  • Remission of the bill of costs for re-taxation

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • NGO Board v EG & 5 Others
  • Premchand Raichand Limited & Another v Quarry Services of East Africa Limited & Another
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case