SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rioba & 2 others (Suing on Behalf of siabai co-operative Society) v Meremo & 4 others; Siabai Cooperative Society & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Tribunal Case 076 of 2025) [2025] KECOPT 531 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECOPT 531 (KLR) Copyright Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Copyright Tribunal
Case number
531
Citation
[2025] KECOPT 531 (KLR)
Decided
30 October 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCooperative DisputePostureAppeal from a preliminary objection and a motion applicationCoramHON. J. MWATSAMA, HON. BEATRICE SAWE, HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA, HON. PHILIP GICHUKI, HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW, HON. P. AOL
Holding

The preliminary objection and motion application are dismissed with costs.

Facts

The Claimants, who are committee members of Siabai Cooperative Society, filed a claim against Respondents alleging breaches of the cooperative's bylaws and failure to convene general meetings. The Respondents opposed the claim and filed a notice of preliminary objection and a motion application.

Issues

  1. Who can institute a suit on behalf of a cooperative
  2. Whether the Claimants have the authority to represent the cooperative

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that the preliminary objection was based on disputed facts that require evidence to establish the correct position, and the motion application was without merit.

Outcome

Both the preliminary objection and motion application are dismissed.

Orders

  • Preservation order for amounts held by the cooperative bank
  • Appointment of a caretaker committee
  • Production order for account of income and expenses
  • Costs to be borne by the Respondents

Remedies

  • Preservation of funds
  • Continuation of operations pending determination of the main claim
  • Account of income and expenses for the cooperative

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Cooperative Societies Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case