Nguru v Metropolitan National Sacco (Tribunal Case E142 of 2024) [2026] KECOPT 116 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Judgment)
- Court
- Copyright Tribunal
- Case number
- 116
- Citation
- [2026] KECOPT 116 (KLR)
- Decided
- 10 February 2026
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMembership DisputePostureClaimant vs Respondent (Sacco)CoramHon. J. Mwatsama- Ag. Chairperson, Hon. B. Sawe- Member, Hon. F. Lotuiya- Member, Hon. P. Gichuki- Member, Hon. M. Chesikaw- Member, Hon. P. Aol- Member
Holding
The claimant has not proved her case and the claim is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Facts
The claimant, Monicah K. Nguru, was a member of Metropolitan National Sacco with savings of Kshs.249,084.89. She resigned her membership on 13/2/2024 and claimed the refund of her savings, but the respondent has not refunded it.
Issues
- Whether the claimant was a member
- Whether the claimant resigned from the membership of the respondent
- How much is refundable to the claimant
Reasoning
The tribunal found that the claimant did not provide any documents to prove her membership or resignation, and the respondent has not responded to the claimant's notice of withdrawal.
Outcome
Dismissed with costs
Orders
- Dismissal of the claimant's case
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…