Amemba v Metropolitan National Sacco Limited (Tribunal Case E905 of 2022) [2026] KECOPT 123 (KLR) (6 February 2026) (Judgment)
- Court
- Copyright Tribunal
- Case number
- 123
- Citation
- [2026] KECOPT 123 (KLR)
- Decided
- 6 February 2026
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureClaimant vs RespondentCoramHon. J. Mwatsama, Hon. Beatrice Sawe, Hon. Fridah Lotuiya, Hon. Philip Gichuki, Hon. Michael Chesikaw, Hon. P. Aol
Holding
The Tribunal finds that the claim is merited and enters judgment in favor of the Claimant for Kshs.282,192.15 plus interest and costs at Tribunal rates.
Facts
The Claimant was a member of the Respondent Sacco with savings of Kshs.292,192.15. He served notice of demand for refund of deposits, but the Respondent did not respond. The Claimant filed a Statement of Claim, while the Respondent filed a Statement of Response.
Issues
- Whether the Claimant is entitled for refund by the Respondent and how much is the refund.
- Membership and savings of the Claimant in the Respondent Sacco.
Reasoning
The Claimant's payslip shows a balance of Kshs.282,192.15, and the Tribunal deducts the non-refundable share capital of Kshs.10,000. The claim has proofed his case on a balance of probability.
Outcome
In favor of the Claimant
Remedies
- Kshs.282,192.15 plus interest and costs at Tribunal rates
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…