SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

SAVINGS & CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED v MONG’ARE (Tribunal Case E644 of 2025) [2026] KECOPT 75 (KLR) (11 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KECOPT 75 (KLR) Copyright Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Copyright Tribunal
Case number
75
Citation
[2026] KECOPT 75 (KLR)
Decided
11 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSavings and Credit Society DisputePostureRespondent filed a Preliminary Objection, Claimant filed a Notice of MotionCoramHON. J. MWATSAMA, HON. BEATRICE SAWE, HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA, HON. PHILIP GICHUKI, HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW, HON. PAUL AOL
Holding

The Tribunal has jurisdiction to issue orders for NTSA access and to appoint an interim manager.

Facts

The Claimant, a Savings and Credit Society, filed a Notice of Motion seeking orders for the Tribunal to appoint an interim manager and allow access to the NTSA portal. The Respondent filed a Preliminary Objection disputing the Tribunal's jurisdiction and the appointment of a manager.

Issues

  1. Tribunal's jurisdiction to issue orders for NTSA access
  2. Tribunal's authority to appoint an interim manager

Reasoning

The Tribunal has jurisdiction over disputes concerning the business of a Sacco, and the appointment of an interim manager is within the mandate of the Sacco's committee.

Outcome

Respondent's Preliminary Objection dismissed

Orders

  • Notice of motion dated 24/7/25 dismissed with costs
  • Respondent ordered to file Statement of Defence, Witness Statement, and List of Documents within 10 days
  • Mention for pre-trial directions on 12/5/26

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • Mukhisa Biscuit Manufacturing Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd (1969)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case