P.C.E.A Ruiru Sacco Limited v P.C.E.A Ruiru Sacco Limited [2021] KECPT 9 (KLR)
- Court
- Co-operative Tribunal
- Case number
- 9
- Citation
- [2021] KECPT 9 (KLR)
- Decided
- 25 November 2021
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConsent Judgment AppealPostureAppeal from a Consent JudgmentCoramHon. B. Kimemia, Hon. J. Mwatsama, Mr. Gitonga Kamiti, Mr. B. Akusala, Mr. P. Gichuki
Holding
The respondent's application is dismissed with costs as it lacks merit and the consent judgment is binding.
Facts
The respondent owed a loan to the claimant and had agreed to pay it off, secure it with a land title, and release a motor vehicle registration number KAT 205K.
Issues
- Whether the respondent has complied with the terms of the consent judgment
- Whether the respondent's application for an injunction is valid
Reasoning
The consent judgment was entered freely by the parties and is executable as an order of the Tribunal. The respondent has not honored the terms of the consent judgment.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Authorities cited
Cases cited (2)
- Setton on Judgments and Orders (7th Edn), Vol. 1 page 124
- The Board of Trustees National Social Security Fund – vs- Michael Mwalo [2015] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…