SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wambua v Ufundi Sacco Society Limited (Tribunal Case 252 of 2019) [2023] KECPT 442 (KLR) (27 April 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KECPT 442 (KLR) Co-operative Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Co-operative Tribunal
Case number
442
Citation
[2023] KECPT 442 (KLR)
Decided
27 April 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureAppeal from a previous decisionCoramHON. BEATRICE KIMEMIA, HON. J. MWATSAMA, HON. BEATRICE SAWE, HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA, HON. PHILIP GICHUKI, HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW, HON. PAUL AOL
Holding

The Tribunal declares that the Claimant and other members of Gateway House Investment are the rightful owners of the plot LR No Nairobi 209/2571.

Facts

The Claimant was a member of the Respondent's Sacco who resigned and withdrew his membership. The Respondent failed to refund his shares within 60 days, leading to a decree in favor of the Claimant.

Issues

  1. Refund of shares
  2. Sale of plot LR No Nairobi 209/2571
  3. Ownership of plot LR No Nairobi 209/2571

Reasoning

The Tribunal considered the well-established procedures for resolving disputes and the hierarchy of courts. The Claimant's request for a permanent injunction was dismissed as the matter was already before the High Court.

Outcome

The Tribunal allowed the application and declared the Claimant and other members of Gateway House Investment as the rightful owners of the plot LR No Nairobi 209/2571.

Orders

  • A declaration that the Claimant and other members of Gateway House Investment are the rightful owners of the plot LR No Nairobi 209/2571.
  • Firm of Orina Riech to come on record for Respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Cooperative Societies Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Alfayo Nyairo vs Nyabomite Farmers Cooperative Society Limited [2021]eKLR
  • East Africa Pentecostal Churches Registered Trustees and 1754 others Versus Samuel Muguna Henry and 4 others [2015] KLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case