SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwai v Noetica Rural Sacco Society Ltd (Tribunal Case 504 of 2014) [2023] KECPT 780 (KLR) (Civ) (31 August 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KECPT 780 (KLR) Co-operative Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Co-operative Tribunal
Case number
780
Citation
[2023] KECPT 780 (KLR)
Decided
31 August 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a previous decisionCoramHON. BEATRICE KIMEMIA, HON. J. MWATSAMA, HON. BEATRICE SAWE, HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA, HON. PHILIP GICHUKI, HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW, HON. PAUL AOL
Holding

The Tribunal finds in favor of the Claimant, declaring the Notice of Sale unlawful and null and void, and granting the Claimant the discharge and release of the original title deed.

Facts

The Claimant, John Gathu Mwai, avers he was a member of the Respondent, Noetica Rural Sacco Society Ltd, and took a loan of Kshs. 2,000,000/=, which was later used to purchase 5 parcels of land. The Claimant claims he was to be paid a commission of 5% of the purchase price, but the payment was credited to his loan account instead. The Respondent later issued a Notice of Sale, which the Claimant disputes.

Issues

  1. The validity of the Notice of Sale issued by the Respondent's agents
  2. The Claimant's entitlement to the original title deed of the property

Reasoning

The Tribunal determined that the Claimant has proved his case on a balance of probabilities, and that no event of default has occurred.

Outcome

In favor of the Claimant

Orders

  • Declaration that the Notice of Sale is unlawful and null and void
  • Discharge and release of the original title deed to the Claimant
  • Costs of the Suit

Remedies

  • Declaration that the Notice of Sale is unlawful and null and void
  • Discharge and release of the original title deed to the Claimant
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case