Onsongo v Nasca Sacco Limited (Tribunal Case 58/E160 of 2022) [2024] KECPT 911 (KLR) (30 May 2024) (Ruling)
- Court
- Co-operative Tribunal
- Case number
- 911
- Citation
- [2024] KECPT 911 (KLR)
- Decided
- 30 May 2024
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureRespondent's Motion for Stay and Set Aside Consent OrderCoramHON. J. MWATSAMA, HON. BEATRICE SAWE, HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA, HON. PHILIP GICHUKI, HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW, HON. PAUL AOL
Holding
The Respondent's Motion for Stay and Set Aside Consent Order is dismissed with costs.
Facts
The Respondent (Nasca Sacco Limited) failed to respond to a demand letter and subsequently sent a Statement of Claim for Kshs. 189,800/=, leading to a Summary Judgment in favor of the Claimant (Mbeche Joram Onsongo). The Respondent did not file a Statement of Defence and was served with a Notice to Show Cause.
Issues
- Respondent's Motion for Stay and Set Aside Consent Order
- Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment
Reasoning
The Respondent failed to respond to the demand letter and did not file a Statement of Defence, leading to a Summary Judgment in favor of the Claimant.
Outcome
The Respondent's Motion for Stay and Set Aside Consent Order is dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Respondent's Motion for Stay and Set Aside Consent Order is dismissed with costs.
- Costs of this Application shall be borne by the Respondent.
- File closed.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…