SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Embu Teachers Co-operative Society Limited v Kivungo (Tribunal Case 44 of 2006) [2025] KECPT 102 (KLR) (30 January 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECPT 102 (KLR) Co-operative Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Co-operative Tribunal
Case number
102
Citation
[2025] KECPT 102 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a decision of the Cooperative TribunalCoramJ MWATSAMA, VICE CHAIR, B SAWE, F LOTUIYA, P. GICHUKI, M CHESIKAW & PO AOL, MEMBERS
Holding

The Tribunal ruled that the firm of Kijaru Njeru and Company Advocates was the Respondent's advocate at the time of the hearing, and the Claimant's claim has merit.

Facts

The Claimant, Embu Teachers Co-operative Society Limited, filed a claim against the Respondent, Daniel Kivungo, alleging misappropriation of funds by Kivungo during an inquiry into the society's affairs in 2003. Kivungo denied the allegations and claimed he was not served with the surcharge order.

Issues

  1. Whether the firm of Gitonga Muriuki was on record for the Respondent at the time of the hearing
  2. Whether the Claimant's claim has merit

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that the Claimant's claim has merit based on the evidence of the inquiry, the issuance of a surcharge order, and the Respondent's appeals to the Minister, the Tribunal, and the High Court.

Outcome

The Tribunal dismissed the Respondent's objection and found the Claimant's claim meritorious.

Orders

  • The firm of Kijaru Njeru and Company Advocates was found to be the Respondent's advocate at the time of the hearing

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Cooperative Societies Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Romane Agencies Limited Vs Tanathi Water Services Board
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case