SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sitanda v Emerging Opportunities Sacco Limited (Tribunal Case 250/E372 of 2023) [2025] KECPT 212 (KLR) (27 March 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECPT 212 (KLR) Co-operative Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Co-operative Tribunal
Case number
212
Citation
[2025] KECPT 212 (KLR)
Decided
27 March 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureClaimant seeks declaration and payment of contributions and dividends, Respondent seeks to defend.CoramHON. B. KIMEMIA, HON. J. MWATSAMA, HON. BEATRICE SAWE, HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA, HON. PHILIP GICHUKI, HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW
Holding

Judgment in favor of the claimant for Ksh.72,000 plus interest.

Facts

Claimant was a member of the Respondent Sacco from January 2015 to August 2021, contributing Ksh.1000 monthly. The claimant requested a refund of his savings and share deposits, which the Respondent failed to honor. The claimant filed a statement of claim and summons, and the Respondent did not enter appearance or file a defence.

Issues

  1. Claimant's entitlement to a declaration and payment of contributions and dividends.
  2. Respondent's liability for the refund of savings and share deposits.

Reasoning

The claimant's contributions were established, and the Respondent failed to provide a statement of account. The tribunal ordered summary judgment in favor of the claimant for the amount claimed.

Outcome

Claimant wins.

Orders

  • Order for summary judgment in favor of the claimant for Ksh.72,000 plus interest.
  • Prayer (a), (c), (d), and (f) of the claimant's statement of claim are dismissed.

Remedies

  • Payment of Ksh.72,000 to the claimant.
  • Interest on the payment from the date of judgment until payment is made in full.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
  • Order 10 Rule (4) and (6) of the civil procedure Rules 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case