SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Beatrice Kanzayire & Another v Adam Gasongo [2014] KEELC 18 (KLR)

[2014] KEELC 18 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
18
Citation
[2014] KEELC 18 (KLR)
Decided
28 November 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeInterlocutory InjunctionPostureApplication for Interlocutory InjunctionCoramJ. L. Onguto
Holding

The court grants the interlocutory injunction restraining Gasongo from obtaining, residing in, managing, or interfering with the suit property until the hearing of the suit.

Facts

Beatrice Kanzayire and Eddy Ntirampeba, as Administrators of the estate of the late Laurent Ntirampeba, seek an interlocutory injunction against Adam Gasongo to restrain him from obtaining, residing in, managing, or interfering with the suit property (Land Reference Number 14605 Nairobi). Gasongo is alleged to have taken possession of the property without the consent of the Administrators.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent (Gasongo) has a legal interest in the suit property.
  2. Whether the Respondent's possession of the property is unauthorized and should be restrained.

Reasoning

The court finds that the Respondent has no legal interest in the property and that his possession is unauthorized. The court considers the special circumstances of the case, including the Respondent's interference with the estate and the Respondent's lack of interest in the property.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • Interlocutory injunction restraining Adam Gasongo from obtaining, residing in, managing, or interfering with the suit property until the hearing of the suit.

Remedies

  • Restraint of Gasongo's unauthorized possession of the suit property.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Law of Succession Act (Cap 160)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • Giella –v- Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd [1973] EA 358
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case