SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joseph Warari Gathoga v Charles Okondo Oteki & another [2014] KEELC 19 (KLR)

[2014] KEELC 19 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
19
Citation
[2014] KEELC 19 (KLR)
Decided
28 November 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication to dismiss for want of prosecutionCoramJ. L. ONGUTO
Holding

The Plaintiff's suit will be dismissed for want of prosecution if he does not take the necessary steps to actively prosecute the suit within the next six months.

Facts

The 1st Defendant filed an application to dismiss the Plaintiff's suit for want of prosecution, alleging that the Plaintiff has not taken any further steps to prosecute the suit since 2007. The Plaintiff opposed the application, stating that the delay was caused by the death of the 2nd Defendant and the Plaintiff's efforts to substitute the legal administrator of the estate.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff's suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution
  2. Whether the Plaintiff's delay in prosecuting the suit is inexcusable and prejudicial

Reasoning

The court dismissed the suit for want of prosecution due to the Plaintiff's inexcusable and inordinate delay, which prejudiced a fair trial.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's suit will be dismissed for want of prosecution if he does not take the necessary steps to actively prosecute the suit within the next six months.

Orders

  • The Plaintiff to take the necessary steps to actively prosecute the suit within the next six months
  • The costs of the application will abide the outcome of the main suit

Remedies

  • The Plaintiff to take the necessary steps to actively prosecute the suit within the next six months
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case