SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Paul Kipsang Kosgei & 2 others v Thomas Kprono Magut & another [2014] KEELC 272 (KLR)

[2014] KEELC 272 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
272
Citation
[2014] KEELC 272 (KLR)
Decided
31 July 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial judgmentCoramJUSTICE MUNYAO SILA
Holding

The defendants' sale to the plaintiffs was fraudulent, and the plaintiffs' contract with the defendants was frustrated. The plaintiffs are entitled to a refund of the purchase price.

Facts

The plaintiffs, Paul Kipsang Kosgei and Esther Jepchumba Mutai, purchased 1/2 acre of land from Japheth Kosgei Kipkorir. The defendants, Thomas Kiprono Magut and Joseph Kipngeno Tonui, purchased 1/4 acre each from Japheth Kosgei Kipkorir. The plaintiffs then sold the land to the defendants, but the defendants refused to pay the remaining balance. The plaintiffs filed a suit for breach of contract and fraud.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendants' sale to the plaintiffs was fraudulent.
  2. Whether the plaintiffs' contract with the defendants was frustrated.
  3. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a refund of the purchase price.

Reasoning

The court found that the defendants coerced the vendor into signing a fraudulent commitment to convey the land, and that the plaintiffs' contract with the defendants was frustrated due to the inability to subdivide the land into smaller plots.

Outcome

The plaintiffs are declared the lawful proprietors of the land parcel, and the defendants are ordered to pay refunds.

Orders

  • That the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs, Paul Kipsang Kosgei and Esther Jepchumba Mutai, are hereby declared to be the lawful proprietors of the land parcel Eldoret Municipality/Block 14/215 as against the defendants.
  • That the contracts of 8 March 2008 and 14 March 2008 are hereby declared as frustrated. The parties thereto are hereby discharged from their obligations and the only remedy of the defendants is a refund of what was paid under the contract and no more.
  • That the defendants do contact Mr. Andrew Tuwai Kiboi the proprietor of M/s Kiboi Tuwai & Company Advocates, and make arrangements to collect their respective refunds of Kshs. 700,000/= and Kshs. 900,000/=
  • The defendants shall bear the costs of this suit.

Remedies

  • Refund of the purchase price
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case