SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Phoebe Njoki Githae v Francis Owino Rao & 2 other [2015] KEELC 565 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 565 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
565
Citation
[2015] KEELC 565 (KLR)
Decided
9 March 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeInterlocutory InjunctionPostureApplication for Interlocutory Injunction DismissedCoramL.N. GACHERU
Holding

The Plaintiff's application for an interim injunction is not merited, and the interim injunction is hereby discharged.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Phoebe Njoki Githae, filed an application seeking an interim injunction against the Defendants, Francis Owino Rao and Henry Okware Emuye, to prevent them from selling, disposing, or interfering with her possession of Flat No. 3 Land Reference No. 205/62. The Plaintiff claims the property is matrimonial and that the Defendants acted fraudulently by transferring it to a third party and charging it for a loan.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff has a prima facie case for an interim injunction.
  2. Whether the Plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury that cannot be compensated by damages.
  3. Whether the court should grant an injunction on a balance of convenience.

Reasoning

The court finds that the Plaintiff has not established fraud and that the property is now held as security by the third defendant. Granting an injunction would restrict the third defendant's ability to exercise its option of sale.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's application for an interim injunction is dismissed.

Orders

  • Interim injunction issued on 14th February 2014 is hereby discharged.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case