SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joyce Wambui Mbau v Attorney General & 2 others [2015] KEELC 567 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 567 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
567
Citation
[2015] KEELC 567 (KLR)
Decided
27 February 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureInterlocutory Application for InjunctionCoramL.N. GACHERU
Holding

The court grants an interlocutory order restraining the Defendants from interfering with the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the application.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Joyce Wambui Mbau, is the widow and administrator of the estate of Francis Mbau Murigi. The suit property, Land Parcel No. Kajiado/Kitengela/2692, was transferred to her husband on 15th June 1990. The Plaintiff claims the Defendants conspired to dispose of the estate and attempted to register a caution over the property in 2013. The 3rd Defendant denies entering into a sale agreement with the deceased.

Issues

  1. Validity of the transfer of the suit property
  2. Time-barred nature of the suit
  3. Plaintiff's prima facie case for an injunction

Reasoning

The court finds that the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case and that the Defendants have conspired to dispose of the estate. The court is satisfied that the Plaintiff has substantial interest over the property and that she would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction is not granted.

Outcome

Interlocutory order granted

Orders

  • The Defendants are restrained from interfering with or in any way alienating Land Parcel No. Kajiado/Kitengela/2692, pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Remedies

  • Injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22
  • Land Control Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd (1973) E.A 358
  • Kenya Breweries Ltd and Another v Washington Okeyo (2002) 1 E.A. 109
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case