SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Leonard Nzioka Mweke v Edward Mutula & 2 others [2015] KEELC 652 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 652 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
652
Citation
[2015] KEELC 652 (KLR)
Decided
27 January 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a lower court decisionCoramP. NYAMWEYA
Holding

The Plaintiff's application for temporary and mandatory injunctions was dismissed.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Leonard Nzioka Mweke, claims to be the registered owner and beneficial owner of plots 551 and 552 off Kangundo Road Saika Makonge. The Defendants, Edward Mutula, Jeremiah Mwanzia, and Samson Mutambauki, are alleged to have unlawfully registered ownership of these plots to an unknown person, who is constructing a building on the properties.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case for the grant of temporary and mandatory injunctions.
  2. Whether the Plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss which may not be compensated by an award of damages.
  3. Whether the Defendants have special circumstances shown over and above the establishment of a prima facie case for a mandatory injunction to issue, and even then only in clear cases where the court thinks that the matter is clear.

Reasoning

The court found that the Plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case for the grant of temporary and mandatory injunctions, and that the Plaintiff would not suffer irreparable loss which may not be compensated by an award of damages.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's application was dismissed.

Orders

  • The Plaintiff's application for temporary and mandatory injunctions was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Giella vs Cassman Brown & Co Ltd, (1973) EA 358
  • Kenya Breweries Ltd and another v Washington Okeyo (2002) 1 E.A. 109
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case