SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Makanga v Githui (Environment & Land Case 546 of 2014) [2015] KEELC 845 (KLR) (23 March 2015) (Ruling)

[2015] KEELC 845 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
845
Citation
[2015] KEELC 845 (KLR)
Decided
23 March 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramBench: B. WAITHAKA, J
Holding

The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the circumstances currently obtaining as concerns the suit property were lawfully caused.

Facts

The plaintiff filed a suit seeking to evict the defendant from the suit property. The defendant filed a counter-claim and an application to restrain the plaintiff from interfering with the portion of the suit property she occupies. The plaintiff filed a chamber summons seeking to restrain the defendant from building on the suit property.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff can evict the defendant from the suit property
  2. Whether the plaintiff can benefit from the defendant's unwilling move out of the property

Reasoning

The court determined that the defendant's possession of the suit property was an overriding interest on the plaintiff's land due to the criminal case not hearing the defendant's claim. The court found that the plaintiff did not demonstrate that the process used to terminate the defendant's interest in the suit property was proper or lawful.

Outcome

The court dismissed the plaintiff's application.

Orders

  • The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to evict the defendant from the suit property.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Registered Land Act, Cap 300 Laws of Kenya (now repealed)
  • Land Registration Act, 2012
Cases cited (1)
  • Giella v. Cassman Brown Ltd (1973) E.A 358
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case