Priscilla Jeruto Kisoso v Kiporot Ole Totona Alias Singo Arap Totona & 3 others [2016] KEELC 229 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 229
- Citation
- [2016] KEELC 229 (KLR)
- Decided
- 21 March 2016
Summary at a glance
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial judgmentCoramMUNYAO SILA
The defendants in the counterclaim are struck off the case as they have not been served and the time for service has expired.
Facts
The plaintiff filed a counterclaim against the defendants, but the defendants have not been served. The plaintiff has asked to strike off the defendants from the counterclaim.
Issues
- Whether the defendants in the counterclaim have been served
- Whether the defendants should be struck off the counterclaim
Reasoning
The defendants have not been served, and the time for service has exceeded 24 months. The court finds that the defendants should be struck off the counterclaim.
Outcome
The defendants are struck off the counterclaim, and the case proceeds with the plaintiff as the only defendant.
Orders
- To strike off the defendants 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th in the counterclaim
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…