SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Monyenye Agao (suing as the administrator of the estate of the late Agao Monyenye) v Orina Murwa (suing as the administrator of the estate of Murwa Ayiem) [2016] KEELC 31 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 31 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
31
Citation
[2016] KEELC 31 (KLR)
Decided
11 November 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAdverse PossessionPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramJ. M. MUTUNGI, Mamboga, Mr. Nyandieka, Mr. Ngare
Holding

The plaintiff's suit is struck out for being incompetent for want of locus on the part of the defendant. The defendant is ordered to bear their own costs of the struck out suit.

Facts

The plaintiff claims adverse possession over a portion of land (LR No. Wanjare/Bogitaa/1060) measuring 1.1 hectares, which he alleges he has occupied and possessed openly, peacefully, and continuously for over 35 years. The defendant is the administrator of the estate of the deceased, and the plaintiff seeks a declaration that the defendant's rights to the land are barred and his title extinguished.

Issues

  1. Declaration that the defendant's rights to recover a portion measuring 1.1Ha of LR No. Wanjare/Bogitaa/1060 is barred under the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22 of Laws of Kenya and his title thereto extinguished.
  2. Order that the plaintiff be registered as the proprietor of the portion measuring 1.1Ha of LR No. Wanjare/Bogitaa/1060 in place of the defendant.
  3. Order restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the suit property.
  4. Costs of the originating summons be borne by the defendant.

Reasoning

The court found the plaintiff's suit incompetent due to the defendant not being the administrator of the deceased estate, and the plaintiff is still entitled to bring a fresh suit against the administrator of the deceased estate.

Outcome

Struck out

Orders

  • The plaintiff's suit is struck out for being incompetent for want of locus on the part of the defendant.
  • The defendant is ordered to bear their own costs of the struck out suit.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case