SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

David Ouma Okore v Phelesia Adoyo Otieno & another [2016] KEELC 314 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 314 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
314
Citation
[2016] KEELC 314 (KLR)
Decided
9 November 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeContempt of CourtPostureApplication for Contempt of CourtCoramS.M. KIBUN, S.M. KIBUN, S.M. KIBUNJA
Holding

The court finds that the 2nd Defendant/Respondent disobeyed the court order by planting sugarcane on the suit land and is in contempt of court.

Facts

The Plaintiff/Applicant, David Ouma Okore, obtained an order restraining the 2nd Defendant/Respondent, Moses Ayaga Adhinga, from entering, remaining in, and interfering with his quiet possession and enjoyment of the suit land. The order was served on the 2nd Defendant/Respondent on June 30, 2014, and the Plaintiff/Applicant claims the 2nd Defendant/Respondent disobeyed the order by planting sugarcane on the land.

Issues

  1. Whether the order issued on June 23, 2014, restrained the 2nd Defendant/Respondent from entering onto the suit land
  2. Whether the 2nd Defendant/Respondent disobeyed the court order by planting sugarcane on the suit land

Reasoning

The court finds that the 2nd Defendant/Respondent disobeyed the court order by planting sugarcane on the suit land, which was confirmed by the Assistant Chief's letter dated June 29, 2016.

Outcome

The 2nd Defendant/Respondent is in contempt of court and is cited accordingly.

Orders

  • The 2nd Defendant/Respondent is in contempt of court for disobeying the court order dated June 23, 2014.
  • A warrant of arrest for the 2nd Defendant/Respondent is to be issued and executed before the next mention date.
  • The 2nd Defendant/Respondent to pay costs of the application.

Remedies

  • Citation for contempt of court
  • Warrant of arrest
  • Payment of costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case