SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joseph Odhiambo v Nyakundi Omari [2016] KEELC 368 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 368 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
368
Citation
[2016] KEELC 368 (KLR)
Decided
14 October 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeInterlocutory AppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the Deputy Registrar dismissing an application to stay execution of eviction ordersCoramJ. M. MUTUNGI, Mr. Odero, Mr. Soire, Mr. Ngare Court Assistant
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Facts

The appellant sought to stay the execution of eviction orders granted by the Deputy Registrar on 10th January 2014, arguing that the judgment sought to be executed was over 12 years old and thus beyond the limitation period. The Deputy Registrar held that the process of execution had begun before the expiry of the 12-year period and that eviction orders had been issued in 2008.

Issues

  1. Whether the judgment sought to be executed was over 12 years old and thus beyond the limitation period.
  2. Whether the decree dated 21st March 1996 was specific enough to be executed.
  3. Whether the Deputy Registrar was wrong in holding that the decree was not in violation of the Limitations of Actions Act, Cap 22 Laws of Kenya.

Reasoning

The court found no basis to interfere with the Deputy Registrar's decision as the judgment was implemented and the respondent was issued with a title to the land on 18th March 2000. The process of executing the decree commenced when the respondent registered as the owner of the parcel of land.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Limitations of Actions Act Cap 22 Laws of Kenya
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case