SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Birongo Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd v Abel Moranga Ongwacho & 4 others [2016] KEELC 40 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 40 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
40
Citation
[2016] KEELC 40 (KLR)
Decided
16 December 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramJ. M. Mutungi, Mr. Ochoki, Ms. Moguche, Ms. Moguche, Mr. Ngare Court Assistant
Holding

The court finds the preliminary objections of the defendants to be without merit and does not make an order for costs. The court orders that the parties maintain the status quo regarding the suit property until the suit is heard and determined.

Facts

The plaintiff, Birongo Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd, alleged that its land parcel LR No. Central Kitutu/Daraja Mbili/66 was fraudulently transferred to the 1st defendant, Abel Moranga Ongwacho. The plaintiff sought a declaration of ownership, reversion and cancellation of the land title, and an injunction.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff's claim is within the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Tribunal
  2. Whether the plaintiff's allegations of fraud are sufficient to justify an injunction

Reasoning

The court rules that the case is not within the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Tribunal due to the challenge of title involving fraud and misrepresentation. The court orders the parties to maintain the status quo until the suit is heard.

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Orders

  • The parties maintain the status quo regarding the suit property until the suit is heard and determined.

Remedies

  • Declaration of ownership
  • Reversion and cancellation of land title
  • Permanent injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Cooperative Societies Act, Cap 490
  • Environment and Land Court Act, 2011
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case