SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nellie Enignus Wamalwa v Rafiki Deposit Taking Micro Finance (K) Limited [2016] KEELC 698 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 698 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
698
Citation
[2016] KEELC 698 (KLR)
Decided
13 July 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureApplication for Temporary Injunction and Suspension of SaleCoramS.M. KIBUNJA, S.M. Kibunja J.
Holding

The court finds that the process to realize the charged property and the advertisement for auction were premature due to the lack of proper service of the notice under Section 90 of the Land Act No.6 of 2012. The court stops the process and orders each party to bear their own costs.

Facts

The Applicant, Nellie Enignus Wamalwa, claimed she was never served with statutory notices before the sale of the suit property was advertised on 2nd September 2015. The Respondent, Rafiki Deposit Taking Micro Finance (K) Limited, argued that the borrower and chargor had defaulted in repayment of the loan.

Issues

  1. Whether the loan facility was in arrears
  2. Whether the requisite notices were issued and served
  3. Whether the Respondent's power of sale had arisen
  4. Whether the orders sought should be granted
  5. Who pays the costs

Reasoning

The court ruled that the Applicant was not properly served with the statutory notice under Section 90 of the Land Act No.6 of 2012, thus the power of sale had not arisen. The court also noted that the Applicant conceded the loan facility was in arrears.

Outcome

The court allowed the application and ordered the process to stop.

Orders

  • The process to realize the charged property and the advertisement for auction are hereby stopped.
  • Each party will bear their own costs.

Remedies

  • The court's ruling stops the process to realize the charged property and the advertisement for auction.
  • Each party is ordered to bear their own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Land Act No.6 of 2012
  • Section 90 of the Land Act No.6 of 2012
  • Section 96 of the Land Act No.6 of 2012
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case