SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Elijah Githinji Gachoki & 2 others v Stanley Mugo Muriuki & another [2017] KEELC 1477 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1477 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1477
Citation
[2017] KEELC 1477 (KLR)
Decided
29 September 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a decision of the Environment and Land CourtCoramB.N. OLAO
Holding

An order of temporary injunction is issued against the defendants restraining them from selling, transferring, disposing, charging or in any other way interfering with the plaintiffs' use, possession and enjoyment of the land parcel No. MWERUA/GITAKU/154 pending the hearing and determination of this suit.

Facts

Land parcel No. MWERUA/GITAKU/154 was registered in the names of the plaintiffs' deceased brother MURIUKI GACHOKI to hold in trust on behalf of the family. The 1st defendant secretly sold a portion of the land to the 2nd defendant.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a temporary injunction against the defendants.
  2. Whether the plaintiffs' suit is res-judicata due to a previous ruling in KERUGOYA HIGH COURT SUCCESSION CAUSE No. 90 of 2013.

Reasoning

The plaintiffs' case is that the land was registered in the names of their deceased brother to hold in trust on behalf of the family. The 1st defendant secretly sold a portion of the land to the 2nd defendant. The Court considers the plaintiffs' case and the 1st defendant's grounds of opposition, ruling that the plaintiffs are entitled to a temporary injunction.

Outcome

The plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction is granted.

Orders

  • An order of temporary injunction is issued against the defendants restraining them from selling, transferring, disposing, charging or in any other way interfering with the plaintiffs' use, possession and enjoyment of the land parcel No. MWERUA/GITAKU/154 pending the hearing and determination of this suit.
  • The 2nd defendant's application seeking the striking out of the suit against him is dismissed.
  • The parties shall comply with the pre-trial directions so that this suit is heard and determined within the next twelve (12) months.
  • Each party to meet their own costs.

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case