SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

United States International University v Maestro Connections Health Systems Ltd & 4 others [2017] KEELC 1510 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1510 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1510
Citation
[2017] KEELC 1510 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand SuitPostureApplication to strike out the 5th defendant dismissedCoramS. Okongo
The 5th defendant's application to strike out the name from the suit is dismissed.

Facts

The plaintiff, United States International University, purchased a parcel of land known as L.R No.15997/2 from the 5th defendant, Icea Lion Life Assurance Company Ltd., in 1999. The plaintiff sub-divided the land and transferred it to Balozi Cooperative Society Limited. The 1st defendant, Maestro Connections Health Systems Ltd., and the 2nd defendant, H. E. Daniel Toroitich Arap Moi, have challenged the plaintiff's title to the land.

Issues

  • Whether the 5th defendant is a necessary party to the suit.
  • Whether the plaintiff's claim against the 5th defendant is time-barred.

Reasoning

The court found the 5th defendant necessary to the suit due to their involvement in the sale of the disputed land. The court also dismissed the time-barred argument.

Outcome

Application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff and the 1st, 2nd, and 4th defendants.

Orders

  • Application to strike out the 5th defendant dismissed

Remedies

  • Costs to the plaintiff and the 1st, 2nd, and 4th defendants

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Safi Petroleum Products Ltd. vs. Abdirahiman Abdi [2007]eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case