SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

David Kabulu Thanyaku v Joseph Ncubiri [2017] KEELC 1666 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1666 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1666
Citation
[2017] KEELC 1666 (KLR)
Decided
4 October 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureApplication for InjunctionCoramHon. L.N. MBUGUA
Holding

The application is allowed, and an injunction is issued to restrain the defendant from entering, cultivating, utilizing, occupying, trespassing, or interfering with the plaintiff's ownership, possession, occupation, and use of the land parcel.

Facts

David Kabulu Thanyaku filed an application seeking an injunction against Joseph Ncubiri to prevent him from entering, cultivating, utilizing, occupying, trespassing, or interfering with the plaintiff's ownership, possession, occupation, and use of land parcel TIGANIA/KITHARENE/2622.

Issues

  1. Ownership of land parcel TIGANIA/KITHARENE/2622
  2. Defendant's illegal retention and trespass on the land

Reasoning

The title deed indicates that the plaintiff is the registered owner of the land parcel. The defendant has prevented the plaintiff from entering the land and has engaged in illegal activities on the land.

Outcome

Allowed

Orders

  • Temporary injunction to restrain defendant from entering, cultivating, utilizing, occupying, trespassing, or interfering with the plaintiff's ownership, possession, occupation, and use of the land parcel pending inter-parties hearing.
  • Permanent injunction to restrain defendant from entering, cultivating, utilizing, occupying, trespassing, or interfering with the plaintiff's ownership, possession, occupation, and use of the land parcel pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Remedies

  • Costs of the application be costs in the cause.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case