SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Livingstone Jason Mukoya Ogongo & 3 others v George William Okello & 3 others [2017] KEELC 1786 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1786 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1786
Citation
[2017] KEELC 1786 (KLR)
Decided
27 September 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand Adverse PossessionPostureAppeal from a decision to dismiss a claim of adverse possessionCoramA. K. KANIARU
Holding

The plaintiffs' claim of adverse possession is dismissed as the certainty of ownership and physical location of the land being claimed was not clear until the survey was done in 1997, and the minimum period for adverse possession had not lapsed by the time the case was filed in 2005.

Facts

The plaintiffs claim ownership of parts of Land Parcel No. SAMIA/BUDONGO/613 by adverse possession, alleging continuous possession for over 30 years. The defendants claim adverse possession was based on misleading information and that the plaintiffs had other land. The land was originally registered in the names of deceased individuals, and the plaintiffs claim they were beneficiaries of the original owners' generosity.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs have established adverse possession over the land
  2. Whether the defendants have a good title to the land

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiffs' claim cannot hold because the certainty of ownership and physical location of the land being claimed was not clear until the survey was done in 1997, and the minimum period for adverse possession had not lapsed by the time the case was filed in 2005.

Outcome

The plaintiffs' claim of adverse possession is dismissed.

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case