SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Abdirizak Abdullahi Alin v Simon Choper & another [2017] KEELC 1997 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1997 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1997
Citation
[2017] KEELC 1997 (KLR)
Decided
9 May 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand SuitPostureAppeal from the original trialCoramE. OBAGA
Holding

The Plaintiff is the rightful owner of Plot No. 11 at Lodwar Town in Turkana County and is granted a declaration and an order of eviction.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Abdirizak Abdullahi Alin, claims to be the owner of Plot No. 11 at Lodwar Town in Turkana County. The Plaintiff bought the land from John Kisaka Mukakula, and he has been given approval to construct on the land. The first Defendant, Simon Choper, is a son-in-law of the second Defendant, Esther Aleper. The second Defendant claims the land belongs to her late brother.

Issues

  1. Ownership of Plot No. 11 at Lodwar Town in Turkana County
  2. Eviction of the Defendants from the suitland

Reasoning

The Plaintiff provided evidence of his purchase and construction on the land, while the Defendants did not provide any documents to support their claims. The Plaintiff has been given approval to construct on the land, which is inconsistent with the Defendants' claims.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's appeal is allowed.

Orders

  • A declaration that the Plaintiff is the rightful owner of Plot No. 11 at Lodwar Town in Turkana County
  • An order of eviction against the Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, and any other person claiming through them from Plot No. 11 at Lodwar Town within Turkana County

Remedies

  • Costs of the suit to be paid by the Defendants
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case